Page 1 of 1
Ways in which LL sucks / could be improved
Posted: Mon 20-Jan-2025 7:02 pm
by greythings20
Quoting from a comment I made on the purple board (https://perb.cc/xenforo/threads/2024-trends-changes-vancouver-edition.371004/#post-2691736):
Leo has become an absolute joke. I am looking forward to when that site collapses and hopefully something better replaces it.
So, I'm in the planning and design stage for a site to replace LL.
The most important "feature" in the design: the site
won't be monetized in any way — so there will be no profit motive to enshittify anything; censor anything; unduly promote anyone; conveniently ignore duplicate users with duplicate ads; neuter search on traits SPs don't like to be compared on; etc. The site's mission statement will be to serve the needs of the pooning community. (Which is to say: I want to build it
so I can use it.)
If anyone here has requests or suggestions for how an LL-like site could better serve your needs, please post them in this thread.
Re: Ways in which LL sucks / could be improved
Posted: Tue 21-Jan-2025 11:56 pm
by anon3893
Aggressive filtering of spam/scam/fake ads and fake pictures. Leolist has so many scam ads. Ability to hide posts/users you don't want to see.
Re: Ways in which LL sucks / could be improved
Posted: Tue 28-Jan-2025 6:53 pm
by justifymyspam
allow for more selections when you filter ads .. would be good to have locked definitions of safe play etc.
Filter out racist providers who have restrictions like no black, etc.
Better spam/verified filtering.
More filtering = less time wasted. SpeakEasy seems to have potential to get there .. but time will tell. Hopefully I am not around doing this to see these changes followed up on lol
Re: Ways in which LL sucks / could be improved
Posted: Tue 28-Jan-2025 8:27 pm
by Gump
Ya, the way services are searched for vs the text in the ad.
If for example, I want to search for providers who offer anal, I don't want results where the provider writes NO ANAL in their ad. I only want results of providers who offer anal. It's endlessly annoying to search through ads on that site because of it.
Re: Ways in which LL sucks / could be improved
Posted: Tue 13-May-2025 9:15 am
by SensualCanuck
Gump wrote: Tue 28-Jan-2025 8:27 pm
Ya, the way services are searched for vs the text in the ad.
If for example, I want to search for providers who offer anal, I don't want results where the provider writes NO ANAL in their ad. I only want results of providers who offer anal. It's endlessly annoying to search through ads on that site because of it.
I totally agree with this suggestion.
Re: Ways in which LL sucks / could be improved
Posted: Sun 18-May-2025 12:35 pm
by John-Hours
Having a rating system for providers for users and a way of having a tag that lets us here looking for bbfs/cip that the user is confirmed that provide these services without it being obvious to everyone maybe a membership for the site and a way to set membership to see that tag if the member confirms through a site such as this
Probably very difficult but I’m just spitballing
Re: Ways in which LL sucks / could be improved
Posted: Sun 18-May-2025 1:07 pm
by blueman
John-Hours wrote: Sun 18-May-2025 12:35 pm
Having a rating system for providers for users and a way of having a tag that lets us here looking for bbfs/cip that the user is confirmed that provide these services without it being obvious to everyone maybe a membership for the site and a way to set membership to see that tag if the member confirms through a site such as this
Probably very difficult but I’m just spitballing
You mean like post leads or tips that a Leo lady offers bbfs without everyone knowing about it, only members?
That almost sounds like a forum, could call it "Toronto bbfs" or something
